USPTO serial 73709589
EMPEROR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMPEROR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES W. JIRAUCH
CHARLES W JIRAUCH STREICH, LANG, WEEKS & CARDONP O BOX 471PHOENIX, AZ 85001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED PROGRAMMABLE COMPUTER FOR INFORMATION EXCHANGE, RECORDING, RECOGNITION, PLAYBACK OR SYNTHESIS, AN INTERFACE TERMINAL, DIGITAL CIRCUITS TO CONTROL THE COMPUTER AND INTERFACE TERMINAL, AND COPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN PROVIDING AUTOMATIC OR SEMI-AUTOMATIC INQUIRY RESPONSE, OR AUTOMATIC OR SEMI-AUTOMATIC DATA ENTRY CAPABILITIES | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1987 |
| 035 | INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AUTOMATED OR SEMI-AUTOMATED TELEPHONE DATA ENTRY USING INTEGRATED COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1987 |
| 038 | COMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AUTOMATED OR SEMI-AUTOMATED TELEPHONE INQUIRY RESPONSES USING INTEGRATED PROGRAMMABLE COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 1989 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 18, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |