USPTO serial 73709838
C.I.S.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C.I.S.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR D. GRAY
ARTHUR D GRAY KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | TEXTILE MACHINES, INCLUDING SPINNING AND SPINNING PREPARATORY MACHINES FOR PROCESSING FIBRE MATERIAL FROM THE BALE THROUGH TO THE YARN; TRANSPORT DEVICES FOR CONVEYING FIBRE MATERIAL BETWEEN PROCESSING STAGES OF A SPINNING MILL | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSOR, CONTROLS AND DIAGNOSTIC TESTING APPARATUS FOR SPINNING MILLS; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN OPERATING SPINNING MILLS AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |