USPTO serial 73710339
ESTASAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ESTASAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COPENHAGEN S., DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS
SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | OIL-BASED INGREDIENTS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF COSMETICS, AND OIL-BASED INGREDIENTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR HUMAN AND VETERINARY PURPOSES | ABANDONED | Jun 16, 1986 |
| 003 | ESSENTIAL OILS USED AS INGREDIENTS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF COSMETICS | ABANDONED | Jun 16, 1986 |
| 005 | SUPPOSITORIES, DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS AND FOOD FOR DIABETICS | ABANDONED | Jun 16, 1986 |
| 006 | EDIBLE OILS | ABANDONED | Jun 16, 1986 |
| 029 | EDIBLE OILS | ABANDONED | Jun 16, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DS INDUSTRIES APS
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named ESTASAN
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |