USPTO serial 73710445
REVUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REVUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SOUTH NORWALK, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLEN D. BRUFSKY
ALLEN D BRUFSKY KRAMER, BRUFSKY & CIFELLI, PCP O BOX 59SOUTHPORT, CT 06490UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | EYEGLASS FRAMES, NON-PRESCRIPTION SUNGLASSES, AND CHAINS FOR HOLDING EYEGLASS AND SUNGLASS FRAMES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1990 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 5, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |