USPTO serial 73710564
CARETAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARETAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PACE COMPUTER SERVICES PTY. LIMITED
LEICHHARDT, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Other trademarks owned by PACE COMPUTER SERVICES PTY. LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. ARMSTRONG III
JAMES E ARMSTRONG III ARMSTRONG, NIKAIDO, MARMELSTEIN ET ALSTE 10001725 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL MONITORING DEVICES, NAMELY, CARDIAC MONITORS, PULMONARY MONITORS, CARDIOVASCULAR MONITORS, RESPIRATORY MONITORS, TEMPERATURE MONITORS, AND BLOODGAS MONITORS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |