Drawing for OP TI MA

USPTO serial 73711491

OP TI MA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OP TI MA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Y. JUDD AZULAY

Y JUDD AZULAY AZULAY AND AZULAY, PCSTE 1600205 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028GOLF CLUBS WITH METALLIC AND NON-METALLIC INSERTSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 19, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 15, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 20, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 20, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 22, 1988CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance