Drawing for C VALENTINO

USPTO serial 73712150

C VALENTINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1597962Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 1990
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with C VALENTINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. PETER HOCHBERG

D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPATHE BAKER BLDG1940 E 6TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014WATCHES AND CLOCKSSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDSep 3, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 1992CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 21, 1992C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 22, 1991CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Nov 1, 1991AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Jan 23, 1991PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 22, 1990R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 5, 1990CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 15, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 23, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance