Drawing for WET-STICK

USPTO serial 73712614

WET-STICK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COFIELD, JULIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WET-STICK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

AARON B. RETZER

AARON B RETZER EADS STATIONJONES, TULLAR & COOPER, PCP O BOX 2266ARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017HYDROPHILIC PRESSURE SENSITIVE ADHESIVE FOR GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USEABANDONEDAug 25, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 1989ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
May 30, 1989PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 1989NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 9, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 2, 1989CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 5, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 3, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance