Drawing for THE STAIN ERASER

USPTO serial 73713277

THE STAIN ERASER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE STAIN ERASER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH J. PREVITO

JOSEPH J PREVITOEMPIRE STATE BLDGNEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SPOT REMOVER IN CAKE FORM FOR REMOVING RUST AND OTHER STAINS FROM TILES, BASINS, TUBS OR OTHER PORCELAIN, CHINA OR ENAMEL SURFACES SOLD THROUGH APPLICANT'S OWN CATALOGUEABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 21, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 12, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 12, 1991EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 9, 1991CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 16, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 3, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 25, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance