USPTO serial 73713277
THE STAIN ERASER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE STAIN ERASER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH J. PREVITO
JOSEPH J PREVITOEMPIRE STATE BLDGNEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SPOT REMOVER IN CAKE FORM FOR REMOVING RUST AND OTHER STAINS FROM TILES, BASINS, TUBS OR OTHER PORCELAIN, CHINA OR ENAMEL SURFACES SOLD THROUGH APPLICANT'S OWN CATALOGUE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 3, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |