USPTO serial 73714226
LEBLANC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEBLANC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNE I. FORS
ARNE I FORS GOWLING & HENDERSONSTE 4900, COMMERCE COURT WTORONTO, ON M5L 1J3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL COMMUNICATION TOWERS AND MASTS AND METAL SATELLITE ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | BROADCAST TRANSMITTERS AND ANTENNAS; MICROWAVE TRANSMISSION TOWERS; ANTENNAS, TRANSMITTERS AND THEIR SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR LAND AND MOBILE USE; GROUNDING RODS | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | SERVICE BUILDINGS AND ENCLOSURES, NAMELY PORTABLE BUILDINGS FOR HOUSING POWER AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | construction of repairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN SERVICES AND INSPECTION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMMUNICATION TOWERS AND MASTS, BROADCAST TRANSMITTERS AND ANTENNAS, MICROWAVE TOWERS, ANTENNAS, TRANSMITTERS AND THEIR SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR LAND AND MOBILE USE, GROUNDING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LEBLANC & ROYLE ENTERPRISES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LEBLANC
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |