USPTO serial 73715047
POLYZORB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BYERS, KRISTEN S.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLYZORB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD M. HERRIOT
HOWARD M HERRIOTP O BOX 1449JANESVILLE, WI 53547UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | LIQUID CHEMICAL SPILL ABSORPTION DEVICES, NAMELY SPILL PADS, SPILL PILLOWS, SPILL BLANKETS AND SPILL KITS; SUCH PADS, PILLOWS AND BLANKETS EACH CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF INERT ABSORBENT SHREDDED FIBER OR PARTICULATE MATERIAL WITHIN AN INERT POROUS FABRIC ENVELOPE; AND SUCH KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF ONEOR MORE OF SUCH PADS, PILLOWS OR BLANKETS, TOGETHER WITH INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THE SAME TO ABSORB A SPILLED LIQUID CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE | ABANDONED | Jul 6, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |