USPTO serial 73715481
GIGGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIGGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILLOWDALE, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNE I. FORS
ARNE I FORS GOWLING & HENDERSONSTE 4900COMMERCE COURT WTORONTO, ON M5L 1J3Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |