Drawing for UNDERWATER WORLD

USPTO serial 73715552

UNDERWATER WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1661136Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 15, 1991
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNDERWATER WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE H. BERNSTEIN

TARLTON AQUASTAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP2435 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD STE 150SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES; NAMELY, PRESENTATION OF AN UNDERWATER THEME AMUSEMENT PARKSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2001CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 22, 2001C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Feb 7, 2001CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Sep 14, 2000PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 4, 1997C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 21, 1997RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Jan 29, 1997PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Jan 17, 1997PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Dec 16, 1996815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 15, 1991R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 23, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 13, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 12, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 14, 1990PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 23, 1989PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance