Drawing for ATOMIC SHELTER

USPTO serial 73715768

ATOMIC SHELTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATOMIC SHELTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES F. MCKEOWN

JAMES F MCKEOWN ANTONELLI, TERRY & WANDSSTE 6001919 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, INCLUDING RECORDING, THEATRICAL AND CONCERT MANAGEMENT AND MUSICAL SELECTIONABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 22, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 28, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 30, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 4, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 7, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 5, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 16, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance