USPTO serial 73716011
TIGER FORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIGER FORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID D. REYNOLDS, ESQUIRE
DAVID D REYNOLDS ESQ BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISWASHINGTON & PRINCE STSTHE GEORGE MASON BLDG P O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | CIRCULAR SAW BLADES | ABANDONED | Mar 8, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 15, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 23, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |