USPTO serial 73717166
PRESIDENT'S CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1579226Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 1990
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, RON
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRESIDENT'S CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tyler Droste
Tyler Droste Gutwein Law200 S. Meridian Street, Suite 420Indianapolis, IN 46225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PROCESSED FRUITS; VEGETABLES; [ MUSHROOMS; OLIVES; PEANUTS; GARLIC; FISH; SHELLFISH; ESCARGOT, namely, SNAILS; POULTRY, AND POULTRY PARTS; ] SMOKED AND PREPARED MEATS; FROZEN PREPARED DINNER ENTREES WITH A MEAT BASE; [ JAMS; ] [ JELLIES; ] [ MARMALADES; PREPARED NUTS; ] [ RAISINS; EDIBLE OILS ] [ ; SALAD DRESSINGS; PEANUT BUTTER; AND SNACK FOODS, namely, POTATO CHIPS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1985 |
| 030 | [ BREADS; ] [ PROCESSED BREAKFAST CEREALS; ] [ COOKIES; CAKES; ] [ TARTS; ] [ BISCUITS; ] [ WAFERS; PASTRIES; PASTAS; TEA; SAUCES, namely, BARBECUE SAUCE, ] [ STEAK SAUCE, ] [ SALSA, HORSERADISH SAUCE, TARTAR SAUCE, SEAFOOD SAUCE, MINT SAUCE, ] [ AND SPAGETTI SAUCE; ] [ CONDIMENTS, namely, CATSUP AND MUSTARD; VINEGAR; ] FROZEN PREPARED DINNER ENTREES WITH A PASTA BASE [ ; POPPED POPCORN; TORTILLA CHIPS; AND GRANOLA BARS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 23, 1985 |
| 032 | [ [ FRUIT JUICES AND CONCENTRATES; BOTTLED WATER; AND ] NONALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, namely, SOFT DRINKS [, AND VEGETABLE JUICE ] ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 26, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOBLAW COMPANIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by LOBLAW COMPANIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by LOBLAW COMPANIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PRESIDENT'S CHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2010 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 5, 2000 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |