Drawing for INFUNITS

USPTO serial 73717354

INFUNITS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFUNITS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIAM M. LEE, JR.

WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE, MANN, SMITH, ET ALSTE 300105 W ADAMS STCHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SUNGLASSESABANDONED—
014WATCHESABANDONED—
018LUGGAGE AND TRAVEL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY; SUITCASES, SHOULDER BAGS, HAND BAGS, PURSES, ATTACHE CASES, KNAPSACKS, MONEY BELTS, BILLFOLDS, WALLETS, PASSPORT COVERSABANDONED—
021HAIR COMBSABANDONED—
025MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, DRESSES, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, TOPS, SWEATERS, SUITS, BLAZERS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT SUITS, TANK TOPS, PANTS, SLACKS, JEANS, SHORTS, JUMPERS, JACKETS, COATS, RAINCOATS, BATHING SUITS, SKI JACKETS, SKI PANTS, MITTENS, GLOVES, UNDERWEAR, PANTYHOSE, CRINOLINES, BELTS, SCARVES, HATS, LINGERIE, PAJAMAS, NIGHTGOWNS, NIGHTSHIRTS, SHOES, RUNNING SHOES, BOOTS, SLIPPERS, AND SANDALSABANDONED—
026HAIR RIBBONS, HAIR CLIPS, HAIR PINSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 1994CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 26, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 28, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 1994CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 16, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 23, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1993CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 9, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 6, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 6, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 15, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 16, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 20, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 15, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance