USPTO serial 73717582
BIOPTRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOPTRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL N. MELLER
MICHAEL N MELLER GRAND CENTRAL STATIONM N MELLER AND ASSOCIATESP O BOX 2198NEW YORK, NY 10163Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF POLARIZED LIGHT OR LASER RADIATION, AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | APPARATUS FOR LASERORPOLARIZEDLIGHT FOR MEDICAL THERAPEUTIC TREATMENT, AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | LAMPS FOR THE PRODUCTIONS OF POLARIZED LIGHT, AND COMPONENTS NAMELY FILTERS AND OBJECTIVE GLASS, AND PARTS THEREOF | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | MEDICAL THERAPEUTIC SERVICES, NAMELY STIMULATION OF BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES AND WOU D TREATMENT BY USE OF LASER BEAM, AND/OR POLARIZED LIGHT APPARATUS GICAL PROCESSES (ALSO WITH REGARD TO THE CELL MEMBRANE) BY X RAY TREATMENT ESPECIALLY BY POLARIZED LIGHT OR LASER BEAMS ALSO FOR PURPOSE OF WOUND TREATMENT AND FOR OTHER THERAPEUTIC PURPOSE AS WELL AS FOR STIMULATION OF MICROBIOLOGICAL PROC | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HARRIER INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BIOPTRON
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |