USPTO serial 73718129
HART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 1990
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICKOLAS E. WESTMAN
NICKOLAS E WESTMAN KINNEY & LANGE, PASTE 1500625 FOURTH AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER NETWORK COMMUNICATION PROTOCOL PROCESSOR FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND USER MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 3, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 14, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 15, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 29, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1989 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 19, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |