USPTO serial 73718680
SNO WHEELS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNO WHEELS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DILLIS V. ALLEN, ESQ.
DILLIS V ALLEN ESQ1080 NERGE RDSTE 205ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL 60007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | SOFT TERRAIN TIRES FOR BICYCLES AND MOTORCYLES | ABANDONED | Feb 19, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |