USPTO serial 73718748
XC XENOGENESIS CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROGERS, GERARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XC XENOGENESIS CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES H. HART
JAMES H HART LEATHERMAN, WITZLER, DOMBEY & HART353 ELM STPERRYSBURG, OH 43551UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | ELECTRONIC PARTS FOR THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY INCLUDING COMPUTER SYSTEMS, CHASSIS SYSTEMS AND SIMILAR SYSTEMS | ABANDONED | Jan 15, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1989 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 11, 1989 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |