USPTO serial 73719666
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E. CATES
CHARLES E CATES CATES & PHILLIPSSTE 12102700 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SOLVENT CONCENTRATE FOR DEGREASING AUTO PARTS | ABANDONED | Feb 16, 1987 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 7, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |