USPTO serial 73720168
MACK BOLAN THE EXECUTIONER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MACK BOLAN THE EXECUTIONER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DON MILLS, ONTARIO, CA
DON MILLS, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELISSA W. McRANEY
MELISSA W MCRANEY FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SERIES OF CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILMS, PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES AND VIDEO DISCS FOR ENTERTAINMENT USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HARLEQUIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HARLEQUIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MACK BOLAN THE EXECUTIONER
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |