USPTO serial 73720919
LAMPRONOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 1990
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAMPRONOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC
MILLBANK, LONDON, GB
LONDON, GB
IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC
MILLBANK, LONDON, GB
IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC
MILLBANK, LONDON, GB
BLAACKLEY, MANCHESTER M9 8ZS, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. JOHN CAMPAIGN
H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM CAMPAIGN36 W 44TH ST STE 1300NEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | A COMPLETE LINE OF DYES, DYESTUFFS, PIGMENTS AND COLORANTS, FOR BOTH INDUSTRIAL AND CONSUMER USE | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC
- Other trademarks owned by ZENECA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC
- Other trademarks owned by AVECIA LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named LAMPRONOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2002 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 13, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 15, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 20, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |