Drawing for WOOLLEY'S PETITE SUITES

USPTO serial 73721257

WOOLLEY'S PETITE SUITES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITAKER, LAURIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOOLLEY'S PETITE SUITES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK I. FELDMAN

MARK I FELDMAN RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601-1293UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042HOTEL AND MOTEL SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 2, 1991PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Oct 17, 1990CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 1990CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 24, 1990JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 12, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 15, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance