Drawing for MAXI-VAL

USPTO serial 73721684

MAXI-VAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1544141Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 20, 1989
Examiner
BYERS, KRISTEN S.
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXI-VAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Broccolo

Andrew J. Broccolo Topco Holdings, Inc.150 Northwest Point BlvdElk Grove Village, IL 60007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005[ ASPIRIN ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 12, 1988
009BLANK VIDEO TAPESEXPIREDJan 12, 1988
011[ LIGHT BULBS ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 12, 1988
016[ GIFT WRAPPING PAPER ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 14, 1988
021[ PAPER PLATES ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 4, 1988
029[ CHEESE, CANNED FRUITS, CANNED VEGETABLES AND FRANKFURTERS ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 8, 1988
030[ CATSUP ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 2, 1988
032[ CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 2, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Apr 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 14, 1996C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 14, 1995815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jun 20, 1989R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 29, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 1988NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 15, 1988CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance