USPTO serial 73722239
OPTI-COTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTI-COTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEFAN J. KLAUBER
STEFAN J KLAUBER KLAUBER & JACKSONCONTINENTAL PLZ411 HACKENSACK AVEHACKENSACK, NJ 07601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PRECIPITATED CALCIUM CARBONATE FOR USE AS A PAPER COATING IN THE PAPER MAKING INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 1989 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 19, 1989 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |