Drawing for BOLT

USPTO serial 73723053

BOLT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOLT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN J. LEAVITT

JOHN J LEAVITT777 N FIRST STSTE 610SAN JOSE, CA 95112-6384

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035MONITORING OF ALARM SYSTEMS FOR OTHERSABANDONEDSep 1, 1972
037INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF ALARM SYSTEMS FOR OTHERSABANDONEDSep 1, 1972

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 30, 1990EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 11, 1989EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 27, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance