USPTO serial 73723392
HYPERFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYPERFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WILLOWDALE, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DATA BASE ACCESS AND USER INTERFACE COMPUTER PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |