USPTO serial 73723476
NIKE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODPASTER, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIKE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
11701. CEUTA, ES
11701. CEUTA, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BREWSTER TAYLOR
CHARLES N QUINN DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL & SKILLMANSTE 720 1601 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | LAUNDRY BLEACHES AND DETERGENTS; ALL-PURPOSE CLEANING PREPARATIONS; DEODORANT, SKIN AND TOILET SOAPS; PERFUMES; BODY OILS; CREAMS FOR THE FACE, HANDS, SKIN AND BODY; HAIR WAVING LOTIONS AND DENTIFRICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 1994 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |