USPTO serial 73723697
PRISTENE WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRISTENE WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Mangelson, Esq.
Michael E. Mangelson, Esq. STOEL RIVES LLP201 So. Main Street, Suite 1100One Utah Center`Salt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BOTTLED DRINKING WATER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 17, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRISTENE WATER, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NATURE'S SUNSHINE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NATURE'S SUNSHINE PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PRISTENE WATER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 7, 1996 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 1996 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1994 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 12, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |