USPTO serial 73725356
SWEDE ELITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWEDE ELITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ANDERSTORP, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM T. BOLAND, JR.
WILLIAM T BOLAND JR KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | VEHICLES FOR HANDICAPPED PEOPLE, NAMELY, WHEELCHAIRS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |