Drawing for THE RAZORBACKS

USPTO serial 73725562

THE RAZORBACKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE RAZORBACKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JODY E. GRAHAM

JODY E GRAHAM MANATT, PHELPS, ROTHENBERG & PHILLIPS11355 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PHONORECORDSABANDONEDJan 4, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 1992OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 2, 1992ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 21, 1992OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 18, 1992OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 21, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 20, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 24, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance