USPTO serial 73726708
ARCWELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARCWELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT V. VICKERS
ROBERT V VICKERSTWENTIETH FLTERMINAL TWRCLEVELAND, OH 44113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRODES AND WIRE FOR WELDING APPLICATION | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |