USPTO serial 73726902
VALISSET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALISSET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR S. GARRETT
ARTHUR S GARRETT FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 1991 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |