Drawing for TEXTURIZING PURIFIER PH

USPTO serial 73727510

TEXTURIZING PURIFIER PH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WISEMAN, MICHELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEXTURIZING PURIFIER PH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A. HIERL, ESQ.

MICHAEL A HIERL ESQ OLSON & HIERL20 N WACKERS DRSTE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SKIN CARE PREPARATION, NAMELY WATER-BASED SKIN TONERABANDONEDNov 5, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 23, 1990EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 1990EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 20, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 11, 1989JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 2, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance