USPTO serial 73729641
POINTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POINTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLISON C. COLLARD
ALLISON C COLLARD COLLARD, ROE & GALGANO, PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT FOR THE REGISTRATION, TRANSMISSION AND REPRODUCTION OF SOUND AND IMAGES, IN PARTICULAR, COMPACT ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS COMPRISING A COLOR MONTOR, A VIDEO RECORDER, A PRINTER, A KEYBOARD, AN ACOUSTIC COMPLER, A SPEAKER, A COMPUTER AND SCREEN TEXT DECODER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |