USPTO serial 73733019
FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON D. COPLEIN
GORDON D COPLEIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | MANICURE IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, NAIL FILES | ABANDONED | May 22, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1990 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 15, 1990 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 1989 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |