USPTO serial 73733760
CRISP N TENDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1567718Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 21, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRISP N TENDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ENID, OK
GORGES/QUIK-TO-FIX FOODS, INC.
DALLAS, TX
HARLINGEN, TX
WILMINGTON, DE
HARLINGEN, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Clifford C. Dougherty, III
CLIFFORD C DOUGHERTY III MCAFEE & TAFT211 N ROBINSON 10TH FL TWO LEADERSHIP SQOKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | COOKED BREADED MEAT PATTIES | EXPIRED | Jun 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADVANCE FOOD COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GORGES/QUIK-TO-FIX FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GORGES FOODSERVICE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TYSON HOLDING COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by GORGES FOODSERVICE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named CRISP N TENDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 15, 1999 | 9.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1989 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 21, 1989 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |