Drawing for CLASSIC

USPTO serial 73734494

CLASSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BYERS, KRISTEN S.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLASSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL E. KRIEGER

PAUL E KRIEGER PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT & KIMBALL1177 W LOOP S10TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77027

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY COMPRESSION HIP SCREW SYSTEMABANDONEDDec 10, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 12, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 12, 1991EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 20, 1990EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 8, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance