USPTO serial 73736600
Serial No. 73736600
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWE, ROBERT J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 73736600?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. FREDERICK
JAMES R FREDERICK PARMELEE, BOLLINGER & BRAMBLETT460 SUMMER STSTAMFORD, CT 06901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINERY FOR PROCESSING AND MIXING RUBBER AND PLASTICS, INCLUDING THERMOPLASTIC, THERMOSETTING, COMPOSITE, AND SHEET MOLDING MATERIALS, AND FOR PROCESSING AND MIXING PIGMENTS AND PIGMENTED ADDITIVES CUSTOM DESIGN, ENGINEERING, AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF EQUIPMENT FOR RUBBER AND PLASTICS PROCE | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | SSING AND MIXING, AND FOR MIXING AND PROCESSING OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, PIGMENTS AND ADDITIVE COMPOUNDS AND OF DESIGNING PRODUCTION FACILITIES INCLUDING SUCH EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |