Drawing for MATRIX

USPTO serial 73737334

MATRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROWE, ROBERT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT W. SACOFF

ROBERT W SACOFF407 WATERGATE SIX HUNDREDWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001MINERAL FILLERS FOR USE IN MANUFACTURE OF PLASTICSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 10, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 4, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 2, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 6, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 12, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 5, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 29, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 19, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 20, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 18, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance