USPTO serial 73737423
ENVIRO-SPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENVIRO-SPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. JAMES BUSHMAN
C JAMES BUSHMAN BROWNING, BUSHMAN, ZAMECKI & ANDERSON5718 WESTHEIMERSTE 1800HOUSTON, TX 77057Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | FLUID CONCENTRATE FOR USE BY THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY IN FORMULATING ENVIRONMENTAL SAFE SPOTTING FLUIDS FOR FREEING STUCK DRILL PIPE IN WELL BORES AND AS A SPACER FLUID BETWEEN OIL MUDS AND CEMENT DURING CEMENTING OPERATIONS | ABANDONED | Jan 4, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |