USPTO serial 73737851
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FREDERICK B. ZIESENHEIM
FREDERICK B ZIESENHEIM WEBB, BURDEN, ZIESENHEIM & WEBB, PC515 OLIVER BLDG535 SMITHFIELD STPITTSBURGH, PA 15222-2363| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, INFORMATION, STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY INFORMATION AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT | ABANDONED | Apr 15, 1988 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1991 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |