USPTO serial 73738481
QUESTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 26, 1991
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QUESTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AUCKLAND, NZ
FILTRATION & PUMPING INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
GLENFIELD, AUCKLAND, NZ
Other trademarks owned by FILTRATION & PUMPING INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
FILTRATION & PUMPING INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
GLENFIELD, AUCKLAND, NZ
Other trademarks owned by FILTRATION & PUMPING INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
FILTRATION & PUMPING INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
GLENFIELD, AUCKLAND, NZ
Other trademarks owned by FILTRATION & PUMPING INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEONIE SEARLE
LEONIE SEARLE ACN 002 430 408QUESTA POOL CLEANER PTY LTD12 CHURCHILL ST SILVERWATERSYDNEY NSW, 2128Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SWIMMING POOL VACUUM CLEANERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TRULOCK PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FILTRATION & PUMPING INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FILTRATION & PUMPING INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by FILTRATION & PUMPING INDUSTRIES, LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named QUESTA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2002 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 27, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 10, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |