USPTO serial 73738562
OPTICARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTICARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GENE S. WINTER
GENE S WINTERST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON AND REENS986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | EYECARE SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 9, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |