USPTO serial 73739369
PACO CHICANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- QUINN, JULIE CLINTON
- Law office
- TMEO LAW OFFICE 15 - REVIEW AND AMENDMENT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PACO CHICANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HORST M. KASPER, ESQ.
HORST M KASPER ESQ13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-SHIRTS, KNITTED SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 1992 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 29, 1991 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 13, 1990 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1990 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1990 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |