Drawing for SECRET GARDEN

USPTO serial 73740260

SECRET GARDEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLUE, RACHEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SECRET GARDEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE REZAC & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SACHETS, POTPOURRI AND COTTON PUFFSABANDONED—
016PAPER DRAWER LINERS; NOTE CARDS; AND STATIONERY, NAMELY WRITING PAPER AND ENVELOPESABANDONED—
018TRAVEL BAGS; GARMENT BAGS; COSMETIC BAGS; LACE POCKETS; LAUNDRY BAGS; AND HAND BAGSABANDONED—
020CLOTHES HANGERS; PILLOWS; AND JEWELRY BAGS SOLD SEPARATELYABANDONED—
021HOME ACCESSORIES, NAMELY LOTION AND SOAP DISPENSERS; JARS AND SOAP DISPENSERS; JARS AND SCOOPS FOR USE WITH POTPOURRIABANDONED—
024CLOTH DRAWER LINERS; LACE; AND HANDKERCHIEFSABANDONED—
025CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY SWEATSHIRTS, COLLARS, RUFFLES, YOKES, SOCKS, BONNETS, BIBS, GARTERS, BALLET SHOES, SLIPPERS, AND GLOVESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 1991ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 2, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 16, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 9, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 31, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 24, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance