USPTO serial 73741317
IDT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 1989
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IDT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SANTA CLARA, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
SANTA CLARA, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Brody-Brown
Dana Brody-Brown Lewis and Roca LLP2440 W. El Camino Real, 6th FloorMountain View, CA 94040-1499UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS, NAMELY RANDOM ACCESS MEMORIES; PROGRAMMABLE READ ONLY MEMORIES; BIT-SLICE APPARATUSES; MICROPROCESSORS; SEQUENCERS; ERROR DETECTION AND CORRECTION APPARATUSES; REGISTER FILES; SUPPORT CHIPS; MULTIPLIERS; ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTERS; AND BINARY COUNTERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 30, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IDT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 14, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |