USPTO serial 73741512
NATURALEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURALEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CHAPMAN MEATS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
NEWCASTLE WEST, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
CHAPMAN MEATS (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
NEWCASTLE WEST, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD N. ARONSON
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL MARZULLO, ET ALPENTHOUSE STEONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME; PROCESSED MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME, NAMELY, LUNCHEON MEATS, SAUSAGES, NUGGETS, HAMBURGER, CROQUETTES, CANNED MEATS AND MEAT SNACKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |